Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

Yongnuo
81 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma
45 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Yongnuo
89
Sigma
33
Wildlife Sports
Yongnuo
87
Sigma
29
Portrait
Yongnuo
87
Sigma
69
Street
Yongnuo
86
Sigma
46
Landscape
Yongnuo
81
Sigma
16
Video Cinema
Yongnuo
79
Sigma
41
Travel
Yongnuo
78
Sigma
17
Budget
Yongnuo
77
Sigma
45
Macro
Yongnuo
75
Sigma
17

Spezifikationen

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mmSigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min12 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm16 mm
Elements14
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements3
CoatingNano Surface Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/22
Constant
Diaphragm Blades7
Build
MountMicro Four ThirdsCanon RF
Formatmicro-four-thirds
Weather Sealed
Weight0.32 kg1.59 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM stepping motorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm
Max Magnification0.5x

Vor- & Nachteile

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average social proof (35th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16mm F1.4 DC DN 16mm

  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average build (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average social proof (15th percentile)15th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm

Scores 81 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Yongnuo YN12-35mm F2.8-4M 12-35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports