Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica
26 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Sony
69 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Leica
17
Sony
82
Budget
Leica
24
Sony
79
Professional
Leica
35
Sony
78
Video Cinema
Leica
32
Sony
74
Wildlife Sports
Leica
20
Sony
72
Travel
Leica
14
Sony
68
Street
Leica
31
Sony
66
Macro
Leica
26
Sony
61
Portrait
Leica
53
Sony
58

Spezifikationen

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mmSony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min180 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max180 mm35 mm
Elements915
Groups712
Aspherical Elements5
ED Elements2
CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades11
Build
MountLeica SSony E
Formatmedium-formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight1.15 kg0.68 kg
Filter Thread82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutomatic/manualXD Linear Motors
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.52 m280 mm
Max Magnification0.32x

Vor- & Nachteile

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

  • Strong aperture (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average build (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average af (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (23rd percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (30th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm

Scores 69 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Sony G Master SEL1635GM 16-35mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports