Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

Leica
27 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Canon
73 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Landscape
Leica
19
Canon
93
Travel
Leica
14
Canon
84
Budget
Leica
24
Canon
83
Professional
Leica
36
Canon
82
Wildlife Sports
Leica
20
Canon
80
Video Cinema
Leica
32
Canon
77
Macro
Leica
28
Canon
68
Street
Leica
31
Canon
66
Portrait
Leica
52
Canon
61

Spezifikationen

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mmCanon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min180 mm24 mm
Focal Length Max180 mm70 mm
Elements918
Groups713
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/3.5f/22
Min Aperturef/3.5f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountLeica SCanon EF
Formatmedium-formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight1.15 kg0.81 kg
Filter Thread82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutomatic/manualNano USM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance1.52 m210 mm
Max Magnification0.21x

Vor- & Nachteile

Leica APO Elmar-S 11071 180mm

  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (16th percentile)16th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM

Scores 73 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 22 specs.

Canon L 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports