Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 f/2 ASPH 35mm
Leica
48 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
Hasselblad
37 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Portrait
Street
Professional
Video Cinema
Landscape
Budget
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 f/2 ASPH 35mm | Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 35 mm | 35 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 100 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 16 |
| Groups | 5 | 13 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 6★ | 5 |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | — | f/32 |
| Min Aperture | f/2 | 2.8-4 |
| Constant | — | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 11★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Leica M | Hasselblad XCD |
| Format | full-frame★ | medium-format |
| Weight | 0.54 kg★ | 0.89 kg |
| Filter Thread | — | 86 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | — | stepping motor★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm★ | 500 mm |
| Max Magnification | — | 1:4.0★ |
Vor- & Nachteile
Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 f/2 ASPH 35mm
- Strong bokeh (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong optical (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Strong aperture (65th percentile)
- Below average build (22nd percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
- Strong optical (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average build (21st percentile)
Preise
Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 f/2 ASPH 35mm
Hasselblad XCD 35-100mm f/2.8-4 E
Fazit
Gewinner: Leica APO-Summicron-M 35 f/2 ASPH 35mm
Scores 48 overall, wins 5 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 18 specs.