Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Nikon
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS
Sigma
69 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Macro
Budget
Portrait
Video Cinema
Landscape
Professional
Street
Wildlife Sports
Travel
Spezifikationen
| Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR | Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | zoom | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 16 mm | 70 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 35 mm | 200 mm |
| Elements | 17 | 20 |
| Groups | 12 | 15 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 2 | 10★ |
| Coating | Nano Crystal Coat | Super Multi-Layer Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/4 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/4 | f/2.8 |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 9 | 11★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Nikon F | Sony E |
| Format | full-frame | full-frame |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.68 kg★ | 1.34 kg |
| Filter Thread | 77 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | Silent Wave Motor | HSM |
| Stabilization | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stabilization Stops | 2.5 stops | 7.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 290 mm★ | 650 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:4 | 1:5.2 |
Vor- & Nachteile
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
- Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong bokeh (79th percentile)
- Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
- Strong versatility (75th percentile)
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS
- Strong optical (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong stabilization (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong versatility (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average build (23rd percentile)
- Below average bokeh (35th percentile)
Preise
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Sigma Sports 70-200mm f/2.8 DG DN OS
No current pricing available
Fazit
Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR
Scores 80 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 22 specs.
