Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
79 Gesamtbewertung
vs
GadgetCenter 202109

GadgetCenter 202109

GadgetCenter
39 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Nikon
79
GadgetCenter
15
Budget
Nikon
78
GadgetCenter
49
Portrait
Nikon
76
GadgetCenter
50
Video Cinema
Nikon
75
GadgetCenter
35
Professional
Nikon
73
GadgetCenter
30
Street
Nikon
68
GadgetCenter
40
Landscape
Nikon
65
GadgetCenter
26
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
59
GadgetCenter
33
Travel
Nikon
55
GadgetCenter
29

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VRGadgetCenter 202109
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm10 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm20 mm
Elements17
Groups12
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingNano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4
Min Aperturef/4f/3.5
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon F
Formatfull-frame
Weight0.68 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm
Max Magnification1:4

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)
  • Strong social proof (74th percentile)

GadgetCenter 202109

  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average build (25th percentile)

Preise

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR is 63.292 ¥ cheaper (1.8x less).

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

GadgetCenter 202109

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 79 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen