Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Nikon
80 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon 1.4x EF Extender III

Canon 1.4x EF Extender III

Canon
49 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Nikon
79
Canon
27
Budget
Nikon
78
Canon
49
Portrait
Nikon
78
Canon
60
Video Cinema
Nikon
76
Canon
47
Professional
Nikon
74
Canon
53
Street
Nikon
69
Canon
64
Landscape
Nikon
66
Canon
40
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
59
Canon
56
Travel
Nikon
58
Canon
52

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VRCanon 1.4x EF Extender III
Optics
Typezoomsuper-telephoto
Focal Length Min16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm
Elements177
Groups123
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements2
CoatingNano Crystal CoatSuper Spectra coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/4
Min Aperturef/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon FCanon EF
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.68 kg0.22 kg
Filter Thread77 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSilent Wave Motor
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops2.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance290 mm
Max Magnification1:41.4x

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

  • Strong optical (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (78th percentile)
  • Strong stabilization (76th percentile)
  • Strong versatility (75th percentile)

Canon 1.4x EF Extender III

  • Strong build (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preise

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR is 32.070 ¥ cheaper (1.4x less).

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Canon 1.4x EF Extender III

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR

Scores 80 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S NIKKOR 16-35mm f/4G ED VR Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen