Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

Sigma
60 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR 16-80mm

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR 16-80mm

Nikon
86 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Sigma
54
Nikon
87
Budget
Sigma
51
Nikon
86
Video Cinema
Sigma
54
Nikon
85
Street
Sigma
53
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
63
Nikon
75
Professional
Sigma
67
Nikon
74
Travel
Sigma
44
Nikon
73
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
51
Nikon
70
Macro
Sigma
69
Nikon
69

Spezifikationen

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mmNikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR 16-80mm
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm80 mm
Elements1717
Groups1313
Aspherical Elements43
ED Elements14
CoatingWater- & Oil-Repellent CoatingNano Crystal and Super Integrated Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.22.8-4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades117
Build
MountL-MountNikon F
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.76 kg0.50 kg
Filter Thread72 mm72 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeHLA-Driven High-Speed AF MotorAF-S
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance280 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.30.22x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Art 35mm f/1.2 DG II 35mm

  • Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong macro (75th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR 16-80mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR 16-80mm

Scores 86 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 4 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR AF-S DX NIKKOR 16-80mm f/2.8-4E ED VR 16-80mm Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports