Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Canon
89 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

Fujifilm
11 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Canon
91
Fujifilm
0
Landscape
Canon
83
Fujifilm
9
Video Cinema
Canon
83
Fujifilm
10
Professional
Canon
82
Fujifilm
10
Travel
Canon
82
Fujifilm
15
Budget
Canon
80
Fujifilm
12
Wildlife Sports
Canon
79
Fujifilm
19
Street
Canon
68
Fujifilm
15
Portrait
Canon
53
Fujifilm
4

Spezifikationen

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STMFujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min28 mm50 mm
Focal Length Max70 mm50 mm
Elements154
Groups124
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating (SSC)Fujinon Super EBC coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/50
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountCanon RFFujifilm X100
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.38 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeSTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5.5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance239 mm
Max Magnification1:4.2

Vor- & Nachteile

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

  • Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Fujifilm Fujinon GF 50mm f/3.5 R LM WR 50mm

  • Strong build (68th percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average aperture (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average optical (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM

Scores 89 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 11 of 22 specs.

Canon RF 28-70mm f/2.8 IS STM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports