Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Brightin Star 11mm f/2.8 II 11mm

Brightin Star 11mm f/2.8 II 11mm

Brightin Star
31 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Brightin Star
21
Portrait
Nikon
89
Brightin Star
21
Street
Nikon
86
Brightin Star
19
Budget
Nikon
86
Brightin Star
24
Macro
Nikon
85
Brightin Star
52
Landscape
Nikon
83
Brightin Star
27
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Brightin Star
16
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Brightin Star
16
Travel
Nikon
75
Brightin Star
18

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Brightin Star 11mm f/2.8 II 11mm
Optics
Typezoomfisheye
Focal Length Min17 mm11 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm11 mm
Elements1311
Groups116
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades98
Build
MountNikon ZCanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm170 mm
Max Magnification1:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Brightin Star 11mm f/2.8 II 11mm

  • Strong social proof (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (19th percentile)19th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports