Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm

Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm

Viltrox
71 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Viltrox
61
Portrait
Nikon
89
Viltrox
60
Street
Nikon
86
Viltrox
71
Budget
Nikon
86
Viltrox
63
Macro
Nikon
85
Viltrox
59
Landscape
Nikon
83
Viltrox
55
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Viltrox
52
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Viltrox
63
Travel
Nikon
75
Viltrox
64

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min17 mm33 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm33 mm
Elements1310
Groups119
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements31
CoatingMulti-CoatedHD Nano Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF-M
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.27 kg
Filter Thread67 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorSTM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm400 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:10

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Viltrox AF 33/1.4 Z 33mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong build (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (80th percentile)80th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports