Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Art AFG9C0 85mm

Sigma Art AFG9C0 85mm

Sigma
51 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Sigma
61
Portrait
Nikon
89
Sigma
90
Street
Nikon
86
Sigma
62
Budget
Nikon
86
Sigma
56
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
52
Landscape
Nikon
83
Sigma
44
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Sigma
55
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Sigma
50
Travel
Nikon
75
Sigma
36

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Sigma Art AFG9C0 85mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min17 mm85 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm85 mm
Elements1314
Groups1112
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1.2
Min Aperturef/2.8f/16
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountNikon ZL-Mount
Formatfull-frameFull-Frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg1.13 kg
Filter Thread67 mm82 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm850 mm
Max Magnification1:5.261:8

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Sigma Art AFG9C0 85mm

  • Strong aperture (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average build (28th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports