Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Ultimaxx UM-ZL650W 650-1300mm

Ultimaxx UM-ZL650W 650-1300mm

Ultimaxx
29 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Nikon
95
Ultimaxx
25
Portrait
Nikon
89
Ultimaxx
33
Street
Nikon
86
Ultimaxx
26
Budget
Nikon
86
Ultimaxx
40
Macro
Nikon
85
Ultimaxx
35
Landscape
Nikon
83
Ultimaxx
33
Video Cinema
Nikon
83
Ultimaxx
29
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
78
Ultimaxx
28
Travel
Nikon
75
Ultimaxx
30

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8Ultimaxx UM-ZL650W 650-1300mm
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto
Focal Length Min17 mm650 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm1300 mm
Elements138
Groups11
Aspherical Elements3
ED Elements3
CoatingMulti-CoatedMulti-coated, anti-reflection
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/16
Min Aperturef/2.88.0-16
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountNikon ZCanon EF
Formatfull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg3.57 kg
Filter Thread67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance190 mm1.30 m
Max Magnification1:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Ultimaxx UM-ZL650W 650-1300mm

  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong versatility (72nd percentile)
  • Below average build (0th percentile)0th %ile
  • Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (30th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 10 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports