Rokinon AF IO2460AFZ-E 24mm

Rokinon AF IO2460AFZ-E 24mm

Rokinon
68 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
95 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Rokinon
73
Nikon
95
Portrait
Rokinon
48
Nikon
89
Street
Rokinon
63
Nikon
86
Budget
Rokinon
71
Nikon
86
Macro
Rokinon
59
Nikon
85
Landscape
Rokinon
71
Nikon
83
Video Cinema
Rokinon
67
Nikon
83
Wildlife Sports
Rokinon
68
Nikon
78
Travel
Rokinon
71
Nikon
75

Spezifikationen

Rokinon AF IO2460AFZ-E 24mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min24 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max60 mm28 mm
Elements1413
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements33
ED Elements23
CoatingUMCMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.49 kg0.45 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeLinear STMStepping Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance180 mm190 mm
Max Magnification0.27x1:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Rokinon AF IO2460AFZ-E 24mm

  • Strong social proof (95th percentile)95th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong versatility (77th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (24th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 95 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports