Canon RF 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 55-210mm
Canon
31 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Portrait
Budget
Video Cinema
Street
Professional
Travel
Wildlife Sports
Landscape
Macro
Spezifikationen
| Canon RF 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 55-210mm | Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | telephoto-zoom | — |
| Focal Length Min | 55 mm | 16 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 210 mm | 300 mm |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/5 | f/3.5 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 | — |
| Constant | ✓ | ✓ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Canon RF | — |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | — |
| Weight | 0.65 kg★ | — |
| Filter Thread | 55 mm | — |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 730 mm★ | — |
| Max Magnification | 0.28x★ | — |
Vor- & Nachteile
Canon RF 55-210mm f/5-7.1 IS STM 55-210mm
- Strong versatility (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average macro (34th percentile)
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
- Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong aperture (78th percentile)
- Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
- Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average optical (21st percentile)
- Below average social proof (29th percentile)
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Scores 44 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 0 of 13 specs.