Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Nikon
83 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 26B965 90mm

Sigma Contemporary 26B965 90mm

Sigma
51 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Nikon
100
Sigma
22
Landscape
Nikon
100
Sigma
27
Wildlife Sports
Nikon
92
Sigma
38
Macro
Nikon
85
Sigma
48
Budget
Nikon
83
Sigma
47
Professional
Nikon
75
Sigma
41
Street
Nikon
69
Sigma
49
Portrait
Nikon
50
Sigma
69
Video Cinema
Nikon
67
Sigma
44

Spezifikationen

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VRSigma Contemporary 26B965 90mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min18 mm90 mm
Focal Length Max140 mm90 mm
Elements1711
Groups1310
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements2
CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperture22-40f/2.8
Min Aperture3.5-6.3f/22
Constant
Diaphragm Blades79
Build
MountNikon ZSony E
FormatAPS-CFull-Frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.32 kg4.13 kg
Filter Thread62 mm55 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorAutofocus
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops5 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance200 mm500 mm
Max Magnification1:31:5

Vor- & Nachteile

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

  • Strong stabilization (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong optical (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 26B965 90mm

  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average build (5th percentile)5th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR

Scores 83 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 VR Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Sigma Contemporary 26B965 90mm Besser bei:

Portrait