Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Ricoh
72 Gesamtbewertung
vs
ATXAF107DXN

ATXAF107DXN

Kenko Tokina USA
40 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Macro
Ricoh
80
Kenko Tokina USA
18
Portrait
Ricoh
76
Kenko Tokina USA
53
Street
Ricoh
76
Kenko Tokina USA
47
Video Cinema
Ricoh
73
Kenko Tokina USA
38
Professional
Ricoh
70
Kenko Tokina USA
35
Budget
Ricoh
58
Kenko Tokina USA
42
Wildlife Sports
Ricoh
57
Kenko Tokina USA
35
Travel
Ricoh
54
Kenko Tokina USA
28
Landscape
Ricoh
48
Kenko Tokina USA
22

Spezifikationen

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mmATXAF107DXN
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min40 mm
Focal Length Max40 mm
Elements7
Aspherical Elements2
ED Elements0
CoatingNano Crystal Coat
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8
Min Aperturef/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountGR
FormatAPS-C
Weight0.26 kg0.36 kg
Filter Thread46 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAF híbrido
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance120 mm

Vor- & Nachteile

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong macro (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

ATXAF107DXN

  • Strong aperture (67th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (66th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Preise

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

No current pricing available

Fazit

Gewinner: Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm

Scores 72 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 19 specs.

Ricoh GR IIIx 40mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Auch in Betracht ziehen