Zeiss Otus ML 1.4/35 35mm

Zeiss Otus ML 1.4/35 35mm

Zeiss
58 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Tamron
93 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Zeiss
57
Tamron
89
Budget
Zeiss
44
Tamron
88
Portrait
Zeiss
48
Tamron
87
Video Cinema
Zeiss
44
Tamron
86
Macro
Zeiss
62
Tamron
84
Landscape
Zeiss
52
Tamron
77
Street
Zeiss
43
Tamron
76
Travel
Zeiss
40
Tamron
72
Wildlife Sports
Zeiss
37
Tamron
69

Spezifikationen

Zeiss Otus ML 1.4/35 35mmTamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min35 mm28 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm75 mm
Elements1517
Groups1115
Aspherical Elements11
ED Elements52
CoatingZEISS T* Antireflective CoatingFluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades109
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.70 kg0.54 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlyVXD
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance300 mm180 mm
Max Magnification1:5.721:2.7

Vor- & Nachteile

Zeiss Otus ML 1.4/35 35mm

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong macro (71st percentile)
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

  • Strong optical (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong macro (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2

Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 2 of 21 specs.

Tamron Di III 28-75mm f/2.8 Di III VXD G2 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports