Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Sony
74 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III-A B061 18-300mm

Tamron Di III-A B061 18-300mm

Tamron
59 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Sony
88
Tamron
64
Landscape
Sony
75
Tamron
62
Street
Sony
74
Tamron
40
Budget
Sony
71
Tamron
60
Wildlife Sports
Sony
67
Tamron
52
Macro
Sony
60
Tamron
66
Professional
Sony
66
Tamron
44
Video Cinema
Sony
64
Tamron
41
Portrait
Sony
58
Tamron
29

Spezifikationen

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS IITamron Di III-A B061 18-300mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max50 mm300 mm
Elements9—
Groups8—
Aspherical Elements4★—
ED Elements1★—
Coating—Fluorine Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/5.6f/22
Min Aperture3.5-5.6f/3.5
Constant✗✗
Diaphragm Blades7★—
Build
MountSony ESony E
FormatAPS-CAPS-C
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.11 kg★0.62 kg
Filter Thread41 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocusVXD
Stabilization✓✓
Stabilization Stops4 stops★—
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm150 mm★
Max Magnification0.215x1:2★

Vor- & Nachteile

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

  • Strong build (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong optical (69th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (21st percentile)

Tamron Di III-A B061 18-300mm

  • Strong versatility (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong macro (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (19th percentile)19th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II

Scores 74 overall, wins 8 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 22 specs.

Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS II Besser bei:

BudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports

Tamron Di III-A B061 18-300mm Besser bei:

Macro