Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Meike
59 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

Sigma
44 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Portrait
Meike
48
Sigma
59
Street
Meike
57
Sigma
46
Budget
Meike
54
Sigma
56
Macro
Meike
55
Sigma
16
Professional
Meike
51
Sigma
42
Travel
Meike
50
Sigma
40
Landscape
Meike
50
Sigma
33
Video Cinema
Meike
48
Sigma
47
Wildlife Sports
Meike
42
Sigma
39

Spezifikationen

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mmSigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS
Optics
Typeprime
Focal Length Min35 mm16 mm
Focal Length Max35 mm300 mm
Elements11
Groups9
ED Elements2
CoatingMultilayered Coatings
Aperture
Max Aperturef/22f/3.5
Min Aperturef/2
Constant
Diaphragm Blades11
Build
MountNikon Z
Formatfull-frame
Weight0.30 kg
Filter Thread58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance450 mm

Vor- & Nachteile

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

  • Strong social proof (89th percentile)89th %ile
  • Strong build (76th percentile)
  • Strong optical (66th percentile)
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
  • Below average bokeh (35th percentile)

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS

  • Strong versatility (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong aperture (78th percentile)
  • Strong bokeh (76th percentile)
  • Below average macro (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)
  • Below average social proof (29th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm

Scores 59 overall, wins 6 of 9 usage categories and 5 of 18 specs.

Meike SE Series 35mm f/2.0 AF 35mm Besser bei:

MacroStreetTravelLandscapeProfessionalWildlife Sports

Sigma Contemporary 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Besser bei:

BudgetPortrait