Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Meike 23mm f/1.4 AF 23mm

Meike 23mm f/1.4 AF 23mm

Meike
71 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Meike
62
Portrait
Sigma
90
Meike
83
Street
Sigma
88
Meike
80
Budget
Sigma
85
Meike
64
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Meike
60
Macro
Sigma
83
Meike
71
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Meike
52
Landscape
Sigma
77
Meike
44
Travel
Sigma
75
Meike
51

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmMeike 23mm f/1.4 AF 23mm
Optics
Typezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm23 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm23 mm
Elements1613
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/1.4
Min Aperturef/2.8f/16
Constant
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.30 kg
Filter Thread72 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorAutofocus
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm250 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Meike 23mm f/1.4 AF 23mm

  • Strong bokeh (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong aperture (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong macro (78th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports