Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm

TTArtisan
58 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
TTArtisan
41
Portrait
Sigma
90
TTArtisan
68
Street
Sigma
88
TTArtisan
48
Budget
Sigma
85
TTArtisan
49
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
TTArtisan
46
Macro
Sigma
83
TTArtisan
41
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
TTArtisan
27
Landscape
Sigma
77
TTArtisan
24
Travel
Sigma
75
TTArtisan
30

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmTTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm
Optics
Typezoomprime
Focal Length Min16 mm35 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm35 mm
Elements167
Groups115
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/0.95
Min Aperturef/2.8f/0.95
Constant
Diaphragm Blades910
Build
MountSony EFujifilm X
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.42 kg
Filter Thread72 mm52 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF Motormanual focus only
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm350 mm
Max Magnification1:5.55

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

TTArtisan APS-C 35mm f/0.95 35mm

  • Strong aperture (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong macro (66th percentile)
  • Below average optical (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average versatility (33rd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports