Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Tamron Di III A062 20-40mm

Tamron Di III A062 20-40mm

Tamron
72 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Tamron
73
Portrait
Sigma
90
Tamron
45
Street
Sigma
88
Tamron
63
Budget
Sigma
85
Tamron
71
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Tamron
61
Macro
Sigma
83
Tamron
75
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Tamron
70
Landscape
Sigma
77
Tamron
71
Travel
Sigma
75
Tamron
71

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmTamron Di III A062 20-40mm
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min16 mm20 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm40 mm
Elements1612
Groups1111
Aspherical Elements41
ED Elements54
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer Coatingfluorine coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/22
Min Aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Constant
Diaphragm Blades9
Build
MountSony ESony E
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.36 kg
Filter Thread72 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorVXD Linear Motor
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm170 mm
Max Magnification1:5.551:3.8

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Tamron Di III A062 20-40mm

  • Strong af (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong macro (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong build (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Below average bokeh (14th percentile)14th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports