Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Sigma
91 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

Canon
47 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
98
Canon
47
Portrait
Sigma
90
Canon
53
Street
Sigma
88
Canon
50
Budget
Sigma
85
Canon
57
Video Cinema
Sigma
85
Canon
51
Macro
Sigma
83
Canon
29
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
80
Canon
47
Landscape
Sigma
77
Canon
38
Travel
Sigma
75
Canon
40

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mmCanon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6
Optics
Typezoomtelephoto-zoom
Focal Length Min16 mm75 mm
Focal Length Max28 mm300 mm
Elements16
Groups11
Aspherical Elements4
ED Elements5
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max Aperturef/2.8f/5.6
Min Aperturef/2.8f/4
Constant
Diaphragm Blades97
Build
MountSony ECanon RF
Formatfull-framefull-frame
Weather Sealed
Weight0.45 kg0.93 kg
Filter Thread72 mm58 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF TypeStepping AF MotorUSM
Stabilization
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm1.49 m
Max Magnification1:5.550.25x

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

  • Strong optical (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong aperture (85th percentile)85th %ile

Canon RF 75-300mm F4-5.6

  • Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
  • Strong versatility (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Below average social proof (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average build (22nd percentile)
  • Below average macro (29th percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 7 of 21 specs.

Sigma Contemporary 16-28mm f/2.8 DG DN 16-28mm Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports