Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
Hasselblad
33 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
Canon
79 Gesamtbewertung
Bewertungen
Landscape
Video Cinema
Professional
Wildlife Sports
Budget
Travel
Macro
Street
Portrait
Spezifikationen
| Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm | Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | prime | zoom |
| Focal Length Min | 38 mm | 14 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 38 mm | 35 mm |
| Elements | 10 | 16 |
| Groups | 9 | 12 |
| Aspherical Elements | 3 | 3 |
| ED Elements | 3 | 3 |
| Coating | — | SWC and ASC |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/32 | f/22 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.5 | f/4 |
| Constant | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Diaphragm Blades | — | 9★ |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Hasselblad X | Canon RF |
| Format | medium-format | full-frame★ |
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | 2.05 kg | 0.54 kg★ |
| Filter Thread | 72 mm | 77 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | linear stepping motor | Nano USM★ |
| Stabilization | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Stabilization Stops | — | 5.5 stops★ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 300 mm | 201 mm★ |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.2★ | 0.38x |
Vor- & Nachteile
Hasselblad XCD Lens 38mm
- Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong optical (74th percentile)
- Strong macro (71st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
- Below average aperture (5th percentile)5th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average versatility (33rd percentile)
Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
- Strong stabilization (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong af (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong optical (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong social proof (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average aperture (21st percentile)
- Below average bokeh (24th percentile)
Fazit
Gewinner: Canon RF14-35mm F4L IS USM 14-35mm
Scores 79 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 9 of 22 specs.