Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

Thypoch
25 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Canon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
Thypoch
28
Canon
97
Portrait
Thypoch
24
Canon
95
Video Cinema
Thypoch
20
Canon
90
Street
Thypoch
16
Canon
82
Travel
Thypoch
20
Canon
81
Wildlife Sports
Thypoch
12
Canon
77
Landscape
Thypoch
17
Canon
76
Professional
Thypoch
15
Canon
75
Macro
Thypoch
23
Canon
68

Spezifikationen

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mmCanon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM
Optics
Typezoomzoom
Focal Length Min70 mm18 mm
Focal Length Max135 mm135 mm
Elements16
Groups12
Aspherical Elements1
ED Elements1
CoatingSuper Spectra Coating
Aperture
Max ApertureT22f/3.5
Min ApertureT2.93.5-5.6
Constant
Diaphragm Blades167
Build
MountInterchangeable Mount with Included Leica M/Nikon ZCanon EF-S
Formatfull-frameAPS-C
Weather Sealed
Weight1.60 kg0.52 kg
Filter Thread77 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typemanual focus onlySTM
Stabilization
Stabilization Stops4 stops
Focus
Min Focus Distance760 mm390 mm
Max Magnification0.28x

Vor- & Nachteile

Thypoch Simera-C TP-SCCZ-MRF 135mm

  • Strong versatility (69th percentile)
  • Below average build (12th percentile)12th %ile
  • Below average af (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average aperture (21st percentile)
  • Below average optical (21st percentile)

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

  • Strong versatility (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong stabilization (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong optical (82nd percentile)82nd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 8 of 22 specs.

Canon EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports