Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

Sigma
75 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Nikon
91 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Professional
Sigma
77
Nikon
89
Macro
Sigma
82
Nikon
88
Budget
Sigma
71
Nikon
85
Street
Sigma
70
Nikon
84
Portrait
Sigma
58
Nikon
84
Video Cinema
Sigma
75
Nikon
82
Landscape
Sigma
72
Nikon
79
Wildlife Sports
Sigma
65
Nikon
73
Travel
Sigma
59
Nikon
70

Spezifikationen

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mmNikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8
Optics
Typeprimezoom
Focal Length Min16 mm17 mm
Focal Length Max16 mm28 mm
Elements1613
Groups1311
Aspherical Elements23★
ED Elements5★3
CoatingSuper Multi-Layer CoatingMulti-Coated
Aperture
Max Aperturef/16f/2.8
Min Aperturef/1.4f/2.8
Constant✓✓
Diaphragm Blades99
Build
MountSony ENikon Z
FormatAPS-Cfull-frame★
Weather Sealed✓✓
Weight0.41 kg★0.45 kg
Filter Thread67 mm67 mm
AF & Stabilization
AF Typestepping motorStepping Motor
Stabilization✗✗
Focus
Min Focus Distance250 mm190 mm★
Max Magnification1:101:5.26

Vor- & Nachteile

Sigma Contemporary 16mm f/1.4 DC DN 16mm

  • Strong optical (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong build (79th percentile)
  • Below average versatility (34th percentile)

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

  • Strong user sentiment (91st percentile)91st %ile
  • Strong optical (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong bokeh (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong af (87th percentile)87th %ile

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8

Scores 91 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 3 of 21 specs.

Nikon NIKKOR Z 17-28mm f/2.8 Besser bei:

MacroBudgetStreetTravelPortraitLandscapeProfessionalVideo CinemaWildlife Sports