ZXQ

ZXQ

ZXQ
34 Gesamtbewertung
vs
TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO Crystal Pods

TOZO
85 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Budget
ZXQ
37
TOZO
83
Gaming
ZXQ
32
TOZO
79
Travel
ZXQ
32
TOZO
78
Fitness
ZXQ
49
TOZO
72
Calls
ZXQ
27
TOZO
70
Commute
ZXQ
28
TOZO
70
Music
ZXQ
27
TOZO
68

Spezifikationen

ZXQTOZO Crystal Pods
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing Styleneckbandtrue wireless
Ear Tips6 pairs ear gelsMedium
Weight0.07 kg0.04 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamicdynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max20 kHz
Impedance32 Ω32 Ω
Sensitivity100 dB
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsZXQ Bluetooth Neckband Earbuds, in-Ear Wireless Around Neck Headphones with Microphone, 6EQ Modes, 35 Hours Long Playtime, Magnetic Design for Music, Sports-BlackLDAC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typehybrid
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.45.4
Multipoint
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life35 hrs7 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs2 hrs
Fast Charging10-minute charge gives 2+ hours of play
ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Case Battery
Case Battery35 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-CUSB-C
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count4
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantOther
Touch Controls
AppTOZO App
Gaming Mode
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX5IPX5

Vor- & Nachteile

ZXQ

  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong battery (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong comfort (72nd percentile)
  • Below average sound (30th percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (31st percentile)
  • Below average anc (32nd percentile)

TOZO Crystal Pods

  • Strong user sentiment (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong anc (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
  • Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: TOZO Crystal Pods

Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 35 specs.

TOZO Crystal Pods Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness