Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Technics
99 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Skullcandy Push S4PFW-T740

Skullcandy Push S4PFW-T740

Skullcandy
39 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Travel
Technics
94
Skullcandy
36
Budget
Technics
94
Skullcandy
45
Calls
Technics
92
Skullcandy
27
Music
Technics
90
Skullcandy
27
Commute
Technics
90
Skullcandy
36
Gaming
Technics
88
Skullcandy
31
Fitness
Technics
80
Skullcandy
30

Spezifikationen

Technics EAH-AZ100-SSkullcandy Push S4PFW-T740
Design
Form Factorin-earopen-ear
Wearing Styletrue wirelesstrue wireless
Ear Tips5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.05 kg0.06 kg
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size10 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max40 kHz
Impedance16 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
SurroundDolby Atmos
Noise Control
ANC
ANC Typeadaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.3
ProfilesAVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint
Wired ConnectorBluetooth
Range10 m
Earbud Battery
Battery Life8 hrs10 hrs
Charge Time2.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 min. for 90 min. playback10 min for 2 hours playback
ChargingUSB-Cproprietary
Case Battery
Case Battery28 hrs42 hrs
Case ChargingUSB-Cproprietary
Wireless Charging
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count6
NC Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls
AppAndroid & iOSSkullcandy
Volume Limiting
Bone Conduction
Water ResistanceIPX4IP44

Vor- & Nachteile

Technics EAH-AZ100-S

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile

Skullcandy Push S4PFW-T740

  • Strong battery (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong comfort (73rd percentile)
  • Strong anc (66th percentile)
  • Below average sound (32nd percentile)

Fazit

Gewinner: Technics EAH-AZ100-S

Scores 99 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 16 of 38 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100-S Besser bei:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness