OKAMUS

OKAMUS

OKAMUS
45 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
OKAMUS
46
HP
91
Business
OKAMUS
40
HP
88
Developer
OKAMUS
39
HP
87
Creator
OKAMUS
42
HP
87
Home Office
OKAMUS
44
HP
87
Workstation
OKAMUS
41
HP
86
Ai Llm
OKAMUS
30
HP
67
Compact
OKAMUS
15
HP
32

Spezifikationen

OKAMUSHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPUCore i7AMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core ScoreKeine Daten
31,207
Cores8
Frequency4.0 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB
Graphics
GPU*Radeon RX 590NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark Score
9,306
28,796
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM8 GB12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM512 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR5DDR5
Storage 1512 GB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form FactorTowermid-tower
PSU550W850W
Weight8.00 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports2
USB Ports8
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWiFi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.3Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 HomeWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

OKAMUS

  • Below average reliability (11th percentile)11th %ile
  • Below average port (21th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 8 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCompactCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation