Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Black 2025

Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Black 2025

Lenovo
42 Gesamtbewertung
vs
HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

HP
96 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Gaming
Lenovo
24
HP
91
Developer
Lenovo
38
HP
87
Creator
Lenovo
30
HP
87
Home Office
Lenovo
42
HP
87
Business
Lenovo
44
HP
87
Workstation
Lenovo
32
HP
86
Ai Llm
Lenovo
15
HP
67
Compact
Lenovo
50
HP
32

Spezifikationen

Lenovo ThinkCentre M75qHP OMEN GT16-0364
Processor
CPU*AMD Ryzen 5 5650GEAMD Ryzen 7 8700F
CPU Multi-Core Score
18,112
31,207
Cores68
Frequency3.4 GHz4.1 GHz
L3 Cache16 MB16 MB
Graphics
GPUAMD RadeonNVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU Benchmark ScoreKeine Daten
28,796
Typediscretediscrete
VRAM12 GB
VRAM TypeGDDR7
Memory & Storage
RAM16 GB32 GB
RAM GenerationDDR4DDR5
Storage 11 TB1 TB
Storage 1 TypeNVMe SSDSSD
Build
Form Factorminimid-tower
PSU65W850W
Weight1.13 kg14.50 kg
Connectivity
USB-C Ports12
USB Ports38
Thunderbolt0
HDMI1x HDMI1 x HDMI
DisplayPort1x DisplayPort3 x DisplayPort
Wi-FiWi-Fi 6Wi-Fi 6
BluetoothBluetooth 5.4Bluetooth 5.3
EthernetGigabit EthernetGigabit Ethernet
System
OSWindows 11 ProWindows 11 Home

Vor- & Nachteile

Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Black 2025

  • Strong storage (73th percentile)
  • Strong reliability (70th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average gpu (10th percentile)10th %ile
  • Below average ram (31th percentile)

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Panda Metal 2025

  • Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong port (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong ram (88th percentile)88th %ile

Fazit

Gewinner: HP OMEN GT16-0364

Scores 96 overall, wins 7 of 8 usage categories and 12 of 26 specs.

Lenovo ThinkCentre M75q Besser bei:

Compact

HP OMEN GT16-0364 Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingCreatorBusinessDeveloperHome OfficeWorkstation