Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700

Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700

Intel
51 Gesamtbewertung
vs
G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

G.Skill
65 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Efficiency
Intel
55
G.Skill
76
Budget
Intel
72
G.Skill
60
Productivity
Intel
49
G.Skill
69
Gaming
Intel
51
G.Skill
61
Ai Llm
Intel
40
G.Skill
58
Server
Intel
40
G.Skill
55

Spezifikationen

Intel Celeron G6900G.Skill Trident Z Neo
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
SeriesCeleronRyzen 5
ModelG69003600
CodenameAlder LakeMatisse
Classdesktopdesktop
Process77
Cores & Clocks
Cores26★
P-cores26★
Threads212★
Base Clock
3,400
3,600
Boost Clock
3,400
4,200
Cache
L2 Cache2.53★
L3 Cache432★
Performance
PassMark Multi
4,472
17,645
PassMark Single
2,666
2,557
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4DDR4
Max Speed
3,200
3,600
Channels22
Max Memory
128
32
ECC✗✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1700AMD Socket AM4
PCIe5.04.0
PCIe Lanes20★16
TDP46★65
Max Turbo Power46★—
Unlocked✗✓★
Graphics & AI
Integrated GraphicsIntel UHD Graphics 710—

Vor- & Nachteile

Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700

  • Strong affordability (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong platform (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong single thread (75th percentile)
  • Strong feature (70th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (19th percentile)19th %ile

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

  • Strong feature (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
  • Strong platform (78th percentile)
  • Strong ai (72nd percentile)
  • Below average affordability (21st percentile)

Preise

Intel Celeron G6900 2-core LGA1700

G.Skill Trident Z Neo 6-core AMD Socket AM4

No current pricing available

Fazit

★ Gewinner: G.Skill Trident Z Neo

Scores 65 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 27 specs.

Intel Celeron G6900 Besser bei:

Budget

G.Skill Trident Z Neo Besser bei:

Ai LlmGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen