fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1
26 Gesamtbewertung
vs
AMD 100-000000136

AMD 100-000000136

AMD
40 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Ai Llm
fosa1
23
AMD
46
Server
fosa1
23
AMD
44
Productivity
fosa1
26
AMD
43
Budget
fosa1
27
AMD
21
Gaming
fosa1
25
AMD
23
Efficiency
fosa1
23
AMD
15

Spezifikationen

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izudAMD 100-000000136
Processor
BrandIntelAMD
Series—EPYC
ModelX56507532
Codename—Rome
Classdesktopserver
Cores & Clocks
Cores632★
Threads12★—
Base Clock
2,660
2,400
Boost Clock
3,060
3,300
Cache
L3 Cache
12
256
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3DDR4★
Max Speed
1,333
3,200
Channels38★
Max Memory
288
Keine Daten
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1366EPYC ROME
PCIe—4.0
PCIe LanesKeine Daten
128
TDP95★200

Vor- & Nachteile

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

  • Strong social proof (65th percentile)
  • Strong platform (65th percentile)
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
  • Below average ai (26th percentile)

AMD 100-000000136

  • Strong platform (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong feature (77th percentile)
  • Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
  • Below average efficiency (33rd percentile)

Preise

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud is 41.028 ¥ cheaper (7.6x less).

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
AMD 100-0000001360.001Score pro Dollar

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud bietet 4.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

AMD 100-000000136

Fazit

★ Gewinner: AMD 100-000000136

Scores 40 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 19 specs.

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud Besser bei:

BudgetGamingEfficiency

AMD 100-000000136 Besser bei:

Ai LlmServerProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen