fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

fosa1
26 Gesamtbewertung
vs
Intel CM8070804497016

Intel CM8070804497016

Intel
73 Gesamtbewertung

Bewertungen

Efficiency
fosa1
24
Intel
80
Budget
fosa1
28
Intel
79
Productivity
fosa1
26
Intel
74
Gaming
fosa1
25
Intel
66
Ai Llm
fosa1
23
Intel
60
Server
fosa1
23
Intel
59

Spezifikationen

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izudIntel CM8070804497016
Processor
BrandIntelIntel
Series—Core i5
ModelX565011400F
Codename—Rocket Lake
Classdesktopdesktop
Process—14★
Cores & Clocks
Cores66
P-cores—6★
Threads1212
Base Clock
2,660
2,600
Boost Clock
3,060
4,400
Cache
L2 Cache—3★
L3 Cache1212
Performance
PassMark MultiKeine Daten
16,884
PassMark SingleKeine Daten
2,980
Memory
Memory TypeDDR3DDR4★
Max Speed
1,333
3,200
Channels3★2
Max Memory
288
128
ECC✓★✗
Platform & Power
SocketLGA1366LGA1200
PCIe—4.0
PCIe Lanes—20★
TDP9565★
Unlocked—✗
Graphics & AI
Integrated Graphics—None

Vor- & Nachteile

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

  • Strong platform (65th percentile)
  • Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
  • Below average multi thread (25th percentile)
  • Below average efficiency (25th percentile)
  • Below average ai (26th percentile)

Intel CM8070804497016

  • Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
  • Strong single thread (81st percentile)81st %ile
  • Strong platform (78th percentile)

Preise

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud is 36.227 ¥ cheaper (6.8x less).

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud0.004Score pro Dollar
vs
Intel CM80708044970160.002Score pro Dollar

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud bietet 2.0x besseres Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis

fosa1 fosa4ycn78izud

Intel CM8070804497016

Fazit

★ Gewinner: Intel CM8070804497016

Scores 73 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 26 specs.

Intel CM8070804497016 Besser bei:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingServerEfficiencyProductivity

Auch in Betracht ziehen