Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
Xiaomi
77 综合评分
vs
Samsung Galaxy Tab 13.1" S10 FE+ Blue
Samsung
43 综合评分
买家怎么说
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
88 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
小米平板因其出色的性价比、流畅的性能和鲜艳的显示屏而广受好评。用户强调快速的144Hz刷新率、良好的电池续航和高级的做工。一些人指出自动刷新率可能会使平板变慢，并且像荣耀Magic Pad 2这样的竞争对手在价格上提供更多，但总体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的性价比
- 流畅的144Hz显示屏
- 良好的电池续航
- 高级做工
- 附带45W充电器的快速充电
缺点
- 自动刷新率可能使平板变慢
- 竞争对手提供更多价值
- 没有最新的骁龙CPU
- 没有合适的适配器充电慢
- 小米不提供操作系统更新
Value for money 6
Display quality 5
Performance 5
Battery life 3
Build quality 4
Audio quality 2
Samsung Galaxy Tab 13.1" S10 FE+ Blue
暂无用户反馈
评分
Entertainment
Reading
Art Design
Student
Productivity
Business
规格
| Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG | Samsung Galaxy Tab 13.1" S10 FE+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| CPU | 2800 MHz | ARM Cortex-A720 (2.90GHz) |
| Cores | 8★ | — |
| Memory & Storage | ||
| RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Generation | — | LPDDR5★ |
| Storage | 256 GB★ | 128 GB |
| Storage Type | SSD★ | — |
| Expandable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Display | ||
| Size | 11.2" | 13.1" |
| Resolution | 3200 px★ | 2880 px |
| Panel | LCD | LCD |
| Refresh Rate | 144 Hz★ | — |
| Brightness | 800 nits★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6E★ | Wi-Fi 6 |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4★ | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| USB-C | 1 | 1 |
| Cellular | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Stylus Support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Stylus Model | — | S Pen |
| IP Rating | — | IP68 |
| Physical | ||
| Weight | 0.45 kg★ | — |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 |
优缺点
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
- Strong screen (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong cpu (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong gpu (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
Samsung Galaxy Tab 13.1" S10 FE+ Blue
- Strong screen (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong connectivity (78th percentile)
- Strong ram (78th percentile)
- Below average battery (30th percentile)
- Below average cpu (35th percentile)
价格
Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG Gray 2025
Samsung Galaxy Tab 13.1" S10 FE+ Blue
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Xiaomi Pad 7 11.2" 2AFZZCRP4CG
Scores 77 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 9 of 21 specs.
