fanxiang S501Q 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
fanxiang
56 综合评分
vs
Samsung 990 PRO 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Samsung
96 综合评分
买家怎么说
fanxiang S501Q 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
72 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
大多数用户对这款SSD感到满意，称赞其速度、性价比和安装简便。然而，一些负面评论强调了对耐用性和随时间性能下降的担忧，一位用户报告了有缺陷的单元。总体而言，它被视为一个不错的预算选择，但有些人建议花更多钱购买高端品牌。
优点
- 快速读写速度
- 物有所值
- 安装简便
- 性能稳定
- 兼容多种设备
缺点
- QLC NAND 质量问题
- 随时间性能下降
- 有缺陷的单元报告
- 不建议重度使用
Performance 8
Value for money 6
Ease of installation 5
Reliability 4
Build quality 3
Compatibility 3
Samsung 990 PRO 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
88 满分 100 置信度低 5 条评价
用户对这款SSD非常满意，称赞其在游戏和照片编辑方面的卓越速度和可靠性能。一位用户提到在激烈游戏时没有散热器温度达到62°C的热担忧，但整体情绪仍然非常积极。该驱动器易于安装，并已证明在一年使用中经久耐用。
优点
- 极速速度
- 安装简便
- 性能可靠
- 翻新价格物有所值
缺点
- 高负载下热担忧
- 不含散热器
Speed 5
Reliability 3
Ease of installation 2
Value for money 1
Thermal performance 1
评分
Console
Gaming
Workstation
Budget
Laptop
Portable
规格
| fanxiang S501Q | Samsung 990 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 3 | 4★ |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | QLC | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | — | Samsung Pascal |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 1 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
fanxiang S501Q 1TB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong social proof (77th percentile)
- Strong endurance (76th percentile)
- Below average feature (15th percentile)15th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (29th percentile)
Samsung 990 PRO 2TB PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong social proof (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong random (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Below average affordability (21st percentile)
结论
胜出: Samsung 990 PRO
Scores 96 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.