Team Group MP44
Team Group
87 综合评分
vs
Crucial T500
Crucial
96 综合评分
买家怎么说
Team Group MP44
88 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价
用户对这款Team Group SSD的评价非常积极，称赞其速度、可靠性和性价比。许多人推荐用于游戏和日常使用，指出尽管没有DRAM，它仍然表现出色。一些人提到它不是大文件写入最快的，但对普通用户来说非常出色。
优点
- 快速读写速度
- 性能可靠
- 性价比高
- 适合游戏
- 适合日常使用
缺点
- 无DRAM
- 大文件写入不是最快
Speed 6
Reliability 5
Value for money 5
Gaming suitability 3
Dram absence 3
Brand trust 3
Crucial T500
88 满分 100 置信度中 15 条评价
Crucial T500 2TB SSD因其快速性能和高性价比而备受赞誉，用户指出它可与更昂贵的驱动器相媲美。安装简单，但有些人提到缺少螺丝以及紧凑型设备中散热器的潜在适配问题。一些用户在克隆后遇到了轻微的软件问题，但总体满意度仍然很高。
优点
- 快速读写速度
- 性价比高
- 安装简单
- 品牌可靠
- 大存储容量
缺点
- 不含螺丝
- 散热器可能存在的适配问题
- 克隆后出现软件问题
Performance 5
Value for money 3
Installation 4
Reliability 2
Compatibility 2
Accessories 2
评分
Budget
Gaming
Workstation
Console
Laptop
Portable
规格
| Team Group MP44 | Crucial T500 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 4 | 4 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | ||
| Random Read (IOPS) | ||
| Random Write (IOPS) | ||
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | SLC★ | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Controller | Maxio | Phison E25 |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | 3 | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
Team Group MP44
- Strong speed (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong capacity (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong random (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (79th percentile)
Crucial T500
- Strong feature (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong random (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong social proof (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Strong speed (94th percentile)94th %ile
结论
胜出: Crucial T500
Scores 96 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 7 of 18 specs.