SanDisk PRO-BLADE Mag
SanDisk
41 综合评分
vs
Samsung 9100 PRO
Samsung
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
SanDisk PRO-BLADE Mag
72 满分 100 置信度中 12 条评价
SanDisk Pro-Blade生态系统因其巧妙的可模块化设计、快速和便携性而受到称赞，尤其是在视频编辑者和专业人士中。然而，可靠性问题十分显著：多位用户报告了有缺陷的单元、电源故障和过热问题，其中一台在90天后就坏了。高昂的入门成本和昂贵的配件是常见的批评，尽管许多人认为便利性值得。总体情绪是积极的，但受到耐用性和性价比担忧的抑制。
优点
- 巧妙的模块化设计
- 快速读写速度
- 便携轻巧
- 非常适合视频编辑
- 物理项目组织
缺点
- 生态系统入门成本高
- 可靠性问题（电源故障）
- 过热问题
- 风扇噪音大
- 有缺陷的单元报告
Design 5
Speed 5
Reliability 4
Value for money 4
Portability 3
Fan noise 2
Samsung 9100 PRO
暂无用户反馈
评分
Workstation
Console
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
规格
| SanDisk PRO-BLADE Mag | Samsung 9100 PRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | External | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | USB | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | — | 5★ |
| External | ✓ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 无数据 | |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 无数据 | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | — | TLC★ |
| DRAM Cache | — | ✓★ |
| Controller | — | Samsung in-house Controller |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | 无数据 | |
| MTBF (hours) | 无数据 | |
| Warranty (years) | — | 5★ |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | — | ✓★ |
| Hardware Encryption | — | ✓★ |
优缺点
SanDisk PRO-BLADE Mag
- Below average feature (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average endurance (14th percentile)14th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (28th percentile)
Samsung 9100 PRO
- Strong random (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
结论
胜出: Samsung 9100 PRO
Scores 100 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 18 specs.