Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGB 32GB DDR5-6000

Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGB 32GB DDR5-6000

Team Group
83 综合评分
vs
A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400

A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400

A-Tech
43 综合评分

买家怎么说

Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGB 32GB DDR5-6000

暂无用户反馈

A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400

92 满分 100 置信度中 13 条评价

用户对这款A-Tech内存模块非常满意,称赞其即插即用的安装方式和立竿见影的性能提升。许多用户升级了旧笔记本电脑,并注意到多任务处理更流畅,延迟减少,以及更好地处理编程和视频播放等要求较高的任务。少数人认为价格可能偏高,但总体而言,它被认为是可靠升级的绝佳性价比选择。

优点
  • 即插即用安装
  • 即时性能提升
  • 流畅的多任务处理
  • 性价比高
  • 兼容多种笔记本电脑
缺点
  • 对某些人来说略贵
  • 未报告重大问题
👍 Ease of installation 6
👍 Performance improvement 9
👍 Value for money 5
👍 Compatibility 5
👍 Reliability 4
👍 Shipping speed 2

评分

Gaming
Team Group
89
A-Tech
29
Budget
Team Group
85
A-Tech
78
Workstation
Team Group
84
A-Tech
30
Laptop
Team Group
61
A-Tech
48
Server
Team Group
38
A-Tech
15

规格

Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGBA-Tech 8GB
Memory
TypeDDR5★DDR4
Form FactorUDIMMSODIMM
Total Capacity
32,768
8,192
Modules2★1
Per Module
16,384
8,192
Pins288260
Rank1Rx81Rx8
Performance
Speed
6,000
2,400
CAS Latency3017★
Timings30-36-36-76—
Voltage1.3500000238418581.2000000476837158★
Class
ECC✗✗
Registered✗✗
OC ProfileIntel XMP 3.0, AMD EXPO—
Features
RGB✓★✗
Heat Spreader✓★✗

优缺点

Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGB 32GB DDR5-6000

  • Strong feature (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
  • Strong speed (87th percentile)87th %ile
  • Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Below average affordability (25th percentile)

A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400

  • Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
  • Strong user sentiment (90th percentile)90th %ile
  • Strong affordability (79th percentile)
  • Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
  • Below average capacity (23rd percentile)
  • Below average speed (29th percentile)

价格

Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGB 32GB DDR5-6000

No current pricing available

A-Tech 8GB DDR4-2400

结论

★ 胜出: Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGB

Scores 83 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.

Team Group T-FORCE DELTA RGB 更擅长:

BudgetGamingLaptopServerWorkstation

也值得考虑