Viltrox AF 9mm F2.8 XF 9mm
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm
买家怎么说
Viltrox AF 9mm F2.8 XF 9mm
Viltrox镜头因其卓越的性价比、锐利的图像质量和坚固的构造而获得压倒性的好评。用户称赞其大光圈和自动对焦性能,尽管有些人指出在高对比度场景中存在色差,以及某些型号的自动对焦噪音较大。总体而言,这些镜头被视为预算友好的替代品,性能远超其价格。
优点
- 卓越的性价比
- 全开光圈时图像锐利
- 坚固的金属结构
- 快速准确的自动对焦
- 令人愉悦的虚化效果
缺点
- 高对比度下的色差
- 视频中自动对焦噪音大
- 低光下自动对焦慢
- 无防风雨密封
- 在小机身上头重脚轻
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm
佳能RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM双鱼眼镜头收到褒贬不一的评价。一位已验证用户报告了一个严重的自动对焦错误,需要重置相机才能修复,并且与佳能VR Utility不兼容。另一位已验证用户认为它是R5系统的一个价格实惠、轻便且带自动对焦的替代品。第三位未验证用户称赞其用于VR视频,称其为婚礼摄像的10/10购买。
优点
- R5设置的经济实惠替代品
- 轻量化设计
- 自动对焦功能
- 非常适合VR视频
- 适合婚礼摄像
缺点
- 频繁丢失自动对焦,需要重置相机
- 与佳能VR Utility不兼容
- 兼容性有限(仅确认R7)
- 没有旋入式ND滤镜选项
- 仅对左镜头主体自动对焦
评分
规格
| Viltrox AF 9mm F2.8 XF 9mm | Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm | |
|---|---|---|
| Optics | ||
| Type | wide-angle | fisheye |
| Focal Length Min | 9 mm | 4 mm |
| Focal Length Max | 9 mm | 4 mm |
| Elements | 13 | 11 |
| Groups | 11 | 8 |
| Aspherical Elements | 2★ | — |
| ED Elements | 3★ | 2 |
| Coating | HD multilayer nano coating | Air Sphere Coating |
| Aperture | ||
| Max Aperture | f/2.8 | f/16 |
| Min Aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5 |
| Constant | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Diaphragm Blades | 7 | 7 |
| Build | ||
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Canon RF |
| Format | APS-C | APS-C |
| Weather Sealed | ✗ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.17 kg★ | 0.29 kg |
| Filter Thread | 58 mm | 31 mm |
| AF & Stabilization | ||
| AF Type | STM | STM |
| Stabilization | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Focus | ||
| Min Focus Distance | 130 mm★ | 201 mm |
| Max Magnification | 1:6.66 | 1:33.33 |
优缺点
Viltrox AF 9mm F2.8 XF 9mm
- Strong macro (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong aperture (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
Canon RF-S 3.9mm f/3.5 STM Dual Fisheye 4mm
- Strong af (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong macro (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong build (76th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average social proof (26th percentile)
- Below average bokeh (30th percentile)
- Below average versatility (34th percentile)
结论
Scores 93 overall, wins 9 of 9 usage categories and 6 of 21 specs.