Focal FBATHYS

Focal FBATHYS

Focal
11 综合评分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Beyerdynamic
82 综合评分

评分

Budget
Focal
19
Beyerdynamic
85
Commute
Focal
7
Beyerdynamic
84
Music
Focal
11
Beyerdynamic
81
Gaming
Focal
3
Beyerdynamic
81
Work
Focal
4
Beyerdynamic
78
Studio
Focal
8
Beyerdynamic
77
Calls
Focal
4
Beyerdynamic
68

规格

Focal FBATHYSBeyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Design
Form Factoron-ear
Open/Closedclosed
Foldable
Weight0.95 kg0.22 kg
Ear Cushionreplaceable ear pads
Headbandaluminum and durable textiles
Audio
Driver Typedynamic
Driver Size45 mm
Drivers1
Freq Min20 Hz
Freq Max22 kHz
Impedance48 Ω
Hi-Res Audio
CodecsAAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC
Noise Control
ANC
ANC TypeAdaptive
Transparency
Connectivity
Wireless
Bluetooth5.4
ProfilesAVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6
Multipoint
Wired Connector3.5mm
Detachable Cable
Range15 m
Battery
Battery Life40 hrs
Charge Time1.5 hrs
Fast Charging15 Minutes for 15 Hours
ChargingUSB-C
Capacity630 mAh
Microphone
Microphone
Mic Count2
NC Mic
Boom Mic
Detachable Mic
Features
Voice AssistantGoogle Fast Pair
Touch Controls
Appbeyerdynamic app
Volume Limiting
Gaming Mode

优缺点

Focal FBATHYS

  • Below average comfort (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
  • Below average connectivity (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average social proof (13th percentile)13th %ile
  • Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong build (96th percentile)96th %ile

价格

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 is €535 cheaper (3.7x less).

Focal FBATHYS0.015每美元得分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.410每美元得分

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 性价比高 27.3 倍

Focal FBATHYS

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

结论

胜出: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609

Scores 82 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 21 of 39 specs.

Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 更擅长:

WorkCallsMusicBudgetGamingStudioCommute

也值得考虑