HiFiMan Ananda
HiFiMan
42 综合评分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Beyerdynamic
85 综合评分
买家怎么说
HiFiMan Ananda
88 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
HiFiMAN Ananda 因其卓越的音质而广受赞誉，提供了巨大的声场、出色的细节还原以及温暖而快速的平板振膜声音特性。用户强调其在当前促销价格下的价值，尤其是与更昂贵的型号相比，并指出作为平板耳机，它相对容易驱动。然而，有些人认为它在休闲聆听时不如 Sennheiser HD6xx 那样令人放松，而且尽管做工有所改进，但在线材和塑料设计方面仍有一些小批评。总体而言，它被认为是用于批判性聆听和游戏的顶级耳机。
优点
- 卓越的音质和细节
- 巨大且身临其境的声场
- 促销价格下极佳的价值
- 对于平板耳机来说相对容易驱动
- 温暖而快速的平板声音特性
缺点
- 不如 Sennheiser HD6xx 放松
- 原装线材感觉脆弱且易损
- 塑料设计对于价格来说显得廉价
- 没有EQ时缺乏深沉的低音
- 明亮的高音可能会让一些人感到疲劳
Sound quality 7
Soundstage 5
Value for money 5
Build quality 5
Comfort 4
Cable quality 3
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
暂无用户反馈
评分
Budget
Commute
Music
Gaming
Work
Studio
Calls
规格
| HiFiMan Ananda | Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | open | closed |
| Foldable | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Weight | 0.40 kg | 0.22 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | — | replaceable ear pads |
| Headband | metal | aluminum and durable textiles |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | planar magnetic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 45 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | 8 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 55 kHz★ | 22 kHz |
| Impedance | 27 Ω | 48 Ω |
| Sensitivity | 103 dB★ | — |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | HIFIMAN Ananda Over-Ear Full-Size Open-Back Planar Magnetic Headphones with Stealth Magnet, Comfortable Earpads, Detachable Cable for Home and Studio | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive, aptX LL, SBC |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | Adaptive |
| Transparency | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.4★ |
| Profiles | — | AVDTP 1.3, HFP 1.9, GAVDP 1.3, SPP 1.2, A2DP 1.4, AVRCP 1.6 |
| Multipoint | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | 1.5 m | — |
| Range | — | 15 m★ |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 40 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 1.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 Minutes for 15 Hours |
| Charging | — | USB-C★ |
| Capacity | — | 630 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Mic Count | — | 2★ |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Fast Pair |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | — | beyerdynamic app |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
优缺点
HiFiMan Ananda
- Strong build (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong user sentiment (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong social proof (71st percentile)
- Below average comfort (10th percentile)10th %ile
- Below average mic (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average anc (33rd percentile)
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong connectivity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (95th percentile)95th %ile
价格
HiFiMan Ananda0.162每美元得分
vs
Beyerdynamic Aventho 10016090.427每美元得分
Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609 性价比高 2.6 倍
结论
胜出: Beyerdynamic Aventho 1001609
Scores 85 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 18 of 41 specs.
