Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300
Beyerdynamic
85 综合评分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC
JBL
91 综合评分
买家怎么说
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300
78 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
这些耳机因其分析性声音、出色的分离度和低音质感而受到称赞，尤其是在使用aptX无损编解码器时。然而，由于声音特性令人疲劳且毫不留情，不建议用于休闲聆听或看电影。电池续航和低延迟受到赞赏，但在宏大的管弦乐作品中声场可能显得平淡。
优点
- 出色的分离度和解析力
- 丰富的低音质感
- 蓝牙低延迟
- aptX无损编解码器下表现出色
- 电子音乐表现出色
缺点
- 看电影和休闲聆听时令人疲劳
- 宏大的管弦乐作品中声场平淡
- 需要aptX兼容音源才能获得最佳音质
Sound quality 2
Analytical sound signature 2
Battery life 1
Latency 1
Codec support 1
Comfort for casual use 1
JBL Tune 670NC
87 满分 100 置信度中 16 条评价
大多数用户喜爱这款JBL耳机，称赞其出色的音质、有效的降噪、舒适的佩戴和长续航，许多人认为性价比很高。一位评论者报告了一个有缺陷的单元，一侧没有声音。简单的控制、可折叠的设计和应用程序连接也受到好评。总体情绪非常积极，但有一个小的质量控制问题。
优点
- 出色的音质
- 有效的降噪
- 长电池寿命
- 舒适的佩戴
- 很高的性价比
缺点
- 可能有缺陷的单元（一侧无声音）
- 问答区的问题没有答案
Sound quality 5
Noise cancellation 4
Battery life 3
Comfort 2
Value for money 3
Build quality 1
评分
Budget
Music
Gaming
Studio
Commute
Work
Calls
规格
| Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300 | JBL Tune 670NC | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | over-ear | on-ear |
| Open/Closed | closed | closed |
| Foldable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Weight | 0.32 kg | 0.17 kg★ |
| Ear Cushion | memory foam | soft ear cushions |
| Headband | memory foam | padded headband |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | 45 mm★ | 32 mm |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 5 Hz★ | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 22 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 32 Ω | 32 Ω |
| Sensitivity | — | 98 dB★ |
| Max SPL | — | 95 dB★ |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codecs | AAC, aptX, aptX Adaptive | SBC, AAC, LC3 |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.4★ | 5.3 |
| Profiles | AVDTP, AVDTP, GAVDP, SPP, A2DP, AVRCP, HFP | A2DP 1.4, AVRCP, HFP 1.8 |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | 3.5mm | 3.5mm |
| Detachable Cable | ✓ | ✓ |
| Cable Length | — | 1.2192000150680542 m |
| Range | 15 m★ | — |
| Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 50 hrs | 70 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs | 2 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 10 Minutes for 5 Hours | 5min=3hrs |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Capacity | — | 690 mAh★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | 1 |
| NC Mic | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Boom Mic | ✗ | ✗ |
| Detachable Mic | ✗ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Dolby Head Tracking Technology | voice assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✗ | ✗ |
| App | Beyerdynamic | JBL Headphones |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✓ | ✓ |
优缺点
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 300
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (87th percentile)87th %ile
JBL Tune 670NC
- Strong connectivity (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong social proof (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong battery (94th percentile)94th %ile
价格
Beyerdynamic AVENTHO 3000.313每美元得分
vs
JBL Tune 670NC1.035每美元得分
JBL Tune 670NC 性价比高 3.3 倍
结论
胜出: JBL Tune 670NC
Scores 91 overall, wins 2 of 7 usage categories and 6 of 43 specs.
