Status Between SAANC-3X
Status
71 综合评分
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 综合评分
买家怎么说
Status Between SAANC-3X
88 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Status Between 3 ANC 耳机因其卓越的音质获得了压倒性的好评，三个专用驱动器提供清晰、平衡的声音和强劲的低音。用户称赞其令人印象深刻的降噪效果、长电池续航和可靠的蓝牙多点连接，尽管有些人指出触摸控制可能不精确，耳塞难以更换。一些孤立的耳机故障问题通过客户支持迅速得到解决，总体而言，它们被认为是发烧友的顶级选择。
优点
- 三个驱动器带来的卓越音质
- 强劲清晰无失真的低音
- 令人印象深刻的降噪效果
- 长电池续航
- 可靠的蓝牙多点连接
缺点
- 触摸控制可能不精确
- 耳塞非常难以更换
- 设计略显笨重，突出
- 两个设备同时活动时多点音频可能中断
- 应用程序可以改进
Sound quality 8
Noise cancellation 5
Battery life 5
Touch controls 3
Fit and comfort 4
Bluetooth connectivity 4
Technics EAH-AZ100
92 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
用户对Technics EAH-AZ100耳机普遍持积极态度，称赞其卓越的音质，尤其是LDAC和杜比全景声，以及令人惊讶的有效AI通话降噪功能，可以屏蔽尖叫的孩子或洗车等背景噪音。舒适度、通过应用程序进行定制以及可靠的电池续航也受到强调。唯一提到的潜在缺点是价格较高，但大多数人认为高端功能物有所值。
优点
- LDAC带来的卓越音质
- AI通话降噪
- 长时间佩戴舒适贴合
- 通过应用程序可自定义均衡器
- 可靠的电池续航
缺点
- 价格较高
- ANC比AZ80稍弱
Sound quality 8
Call quality 2
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 4
Battery life 2
Value for money 3
评分
Budget
Travel
Calls
Commute
Music
Gaming
Fitness
规格
| Status Between SAANC-3X | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | multiple ear tip sizes and wingtips | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.05 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | hybrid | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 3★ | 1 |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Status Between 3ANC Onyx True Active Noise Cancelling Wireless Earbuds - Black iPhone & Android ANC in Ear Buds, Charging Case, Built-in 6 Microphones, 8H Playtime, Bluetooth 5.2, IPX5 | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | advanced | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 0.25 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 15 min for 2 hours playback | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 24 hrs | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6 | 6 |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Siri, Google Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX5 | IPX4 |
优缺点
Status Between SAANC-3X
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong build (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong sound (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Below average comfort (29th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong mic (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong anc (97th percentile)97th %ile
价格
Status Between SAANC-3X
Technics EAH-AZ100
No current pricing available
结论
胜出: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 8 of 39 specs.
