Intel Core i7 3770 4-core LGA 1155
Intel
54 综合评分
vs
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
HP
75 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core i7 3770 4-core LGA 1155
88 满分 100 置信度中 20 条评价
用户对这款处理器非常满意，称赞其速度，尤其是在照片和视频编辑任务中。它被视为旧系统升级的绝佳选择，尽管是非K型号，但性能良好且具有超频潜力。对原装散热器在负载下的适用性和价格有些担忧，但总体满意度很高。
优点
- 性能快速
- 适合照片/视频编辑
- 良好的超频潜力
- 兼容旧主板
- 使用第三方散热器时负载稳定
缺点
- 原装散热器在负载下不足
- 与AMD相比价格偏高
- 非K型号，超频不便
Performance 6
Overclocking 4
Stock cooler 4
Value for money 3
Compatibility 3
Temperature 3
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
暂无用户反馈
评分
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
规格
| Intel Core i7 3770 | HP Xeon 6526Y | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Core i7 | Xeon Gold |
| Model | 3770 | 6526Y |
| Codename | Ivy Bridge | — |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | 22★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4 | 16★ |
| P-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 8 | 32★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 1 | 32★ |
| L3 Cache | 8 | 37★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR3 | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1155 | LGA 4677 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 80★ |
| TDP | 77★ | 195 |
| Max Turbo Power | 77★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 4000 | No |
优缺点
Intel Core i7 3770 4-core LGA 1155
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong affordability (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Strong user sentiment (78th percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
- Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong multi thread (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong single thread (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
价格
Intel Core i7 3770 4-core LGA 11550.455每美元得分
vs
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 46770.036每美元得分
Intel Core i7 3770 4-core LGA 1155 性价比高 12.6 倍
结论
胜出: HP Xeon 6526Y
Scores 75 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 27 specs.
