Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
Intel
98 综合评分
vs
AMD EPYC 7713 64-core SP3
AMD
73 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
AMD EPYC 7713 64-core SP3
暂无用户反馈
评分
Ai Llm
Productivity
Gaming
Budget
Efficiency
Server
规格
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | AMD EPYC 7713 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 9 | EPYC |
| Model | 285K | 7713 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Zen 3 |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | 3★ | 7 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24 | 64★ |
| P-cores | 8 | 64★ |
| E-cores | 16★ | — |
| Threads | ||
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 40★ | 32 |
| L3 Cache | ||
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1851 | SP3 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | ||
| TDP | 125★ | 225 |
| Max Turbo Power | 250 | 240★ |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | — |
| NPU TOPS | 13★ | — |
优缺点
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average affordability (18th percentile)18th %ile
AMD EPYC 7713 64-core SP3
- Strong ai (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong multi thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong efficiency (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong platform (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
- Below average social proof (12th percentile)12th %ile
价格
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 18510.179每美元得分
vs
AMD EPYC 7713 64-core SP30.018每美元得分
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA 1851 性价比高 9.9 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 13 of 29 specs.