Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
Intel
98 综合评分
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM4
AMD
59 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
88 满分 100 置信度高 32 条评价
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 因其原始性能而广受赞誉，尤其是在4K游戏和繁重多任务处理方面，用户注意到与旧CPU相比有显著提升。在适当散热下保持凉爽，其效率和DDR5及PCIe 5.0支持被强调为重大优势。一些人提到在1080p/1440p游戏中可能不如AMD，但在4K和生产力方面表现出色。少数人指出缺少散热器和托盘包装是次要缺点，但整体情绪非常积极。
优点
- 出色的4K游戏性能
- 强大的多任务处理和生产效率
- 适当散热下保持凉爽
- 支持DDR5和PCIe 5.0
- 能效高（125W TDP）
缺点
- 不附带散热器
- 托盘包装（无零售盒）
- 在1080p/1440p游戏中可能落后于AMD
- 需要BIOS调整以获得最佳性能
- 价格较高
Gaming performance 8
Multitasking productivity 6
Thermal management 5
Power efficiency 4
Memory support 4
Value for money 3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM4
62 满分 100 置信度中 29 条评价
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 在性能和价值方面表现出色，尤其是在多任务处理和内容创作方面，但用户体验褒贬不一。一些用户收到的 CPU 针脚弯曲或缺少宣传的散热器，导致退货和不满。虽然处理器安装后运行良好，但包装、配件缺失以及原装散热器高温的问题值得注意。
优点
- 性价比高
- 强大的多任务处理和内容创作
- 8核16线程
- 兼容AM4主板
- 附带Wraith Spire散热器
缺点
- 到货时针脚弯曲
- 部分订单缺少散热器
- 原装散热器温度高
- 无集成显卡
- 配送缓慢
Value for money 3
Performance 5
Cooler included 4
Build quality 2
Temperature 2
Delivery speed 2
评分
Ai Llm
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Efficiency
Server
规格
| Intel Core Ultra 9 285K | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | AMD |
| Series | Core Ultra 9 | Ryzen 7 |
| Model | 285K | 2700 |
| Codename | Arrow Lake-S | Pinnacle Ridge (Zen+) |
| Class | desktop | desktop |
| Process | 3★ | 12 |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 24★ | 8 |
| P-cores | 8 | 8 |
| E-cores | 16★ | — |
| Threads | 24★ | 16 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 40★ | 4 |
| L3 Cache | 36★ | 16 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1851 | AM4 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 24★ | 16 |
| TDP | 125 | 65★ |
| Max Turbo Power | 250★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✓ | ✓ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel Graphics | — |
| NPU TOPS | 13★ | — |
优缺点
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851
- Strong feature (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong single thread (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong efficiency (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong efficiency (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Strong multi thread (71st percentile)
- Strong platform (70th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (9th percentile)9th %ile
价格
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA18510.179每美元得分
vs
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 8-core AM40.112每美元得分
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K 24-core LGA1851 性价比高 1.6 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core Ultra 9 285K
Scores 98 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 17 of 29 specs.