AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4
AMD
65 综合评分
vs
Dell 7700
Dell
60 综合评分
买家怎么说
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4
72 满分 100 置信度中 10 条评价
AMD Threadripper 1950X 因其原始性能和生产能力而受到称赞，尤其是在视频编辑、3D渲染和多任务处理方面。然而，关于游戏的看法褒贬不一，有些人认为它对于游戏来说过于强大，而另一些人则看到未来的好处。用户欣赏64条PCIe通道和ECC支持，但提醒注意电源要求和内存兼容性。
优点
- 出色的生产力性能
- 64条PCIe通道
- ECC内存支持
- 适合视频编辑和渲染
- 游戏未来可期
缺点
- 游戏性能过剩
- 高电源要求
- 内存兼容性问题
- 发布时散热器支持有限
- 虚拟化可能卡顿
Gaming performance 4
Productivity performance 3
Power requirements 2
Ram compatibility 2
Pcie lanes 2
Cooler support 2
Dell 7700
暂无用户反馈
评分
Efficiency
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Gaming
规格
| AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | Dell 7700 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | AMD | Intel |
| Series | Ryzen Threadripper | Core i7 |
| Model | 1950X | 1255U |
| Codename | Whitehaven (Zen) | Alder Lake-U |
| Class | hedt | laptop |
| Process | 14 | 10★ |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 16★ | 10 |
| P-cores | — | 2★ |
| E-cores | — | 8★ |
| Threads | 32★ | 12 |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 8★ | 2.5 |
| L3 Cache | 32★ | 12 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR4 |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 4★ | — |
| Max Memory | — | 64★ |
| ECC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | sTR4 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 64★ | 20 |
| TDP | 180 | 15★ |
| Max Turbo Power | — | 55★ |
| Unlocked | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | — | Iris Xe 96EU |
优缺点
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-core sTR4
- Strong social proof (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong platform (86th percentile)86th %ile
- Strong multi thread (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong ai (80th percentile)80th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Dell 7700
- Strong efficiency (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong single thread (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong platform (71st percentile)
- Strong feature (70th percentile)
- Below average social proof (25th percentile)
结论
胜出: AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Scores 65 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 10 of 28 specs.