Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200
Intel
59 综合评分
vs
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
HP
75 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200
78 满分 100 置信度低 8 条评价
Intel Core i3-10320 在预算装机、办公和轻量服务器中普遍受到好评。用户称赞其速度和性价比，但部分人指出涡轮加速无法达到宣传的4.6 GHz，仅能到4.4-4.5 GHz。有评论提到原装散热器下温度较高，还有一位买家收到了二手产品而非新品。
优点
- 价格实惠，速度不错
- 适合预算游戏和办公
- 低功耗（65W TDP）
- 原装散热器安装简便
- 相比旧款i3提升明显
缺点
- 涡轮加速低于宣传的4.6 GHz（仅4.4-4.5 GHz）
- 原装散热器下温度较高
- 部分产品收到的是二手而非全新
Performance 6
Value for money 4
Turbo boost accuracy 3
Cooling 2
Product condition 1
Power consumption 2
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
暂无用户反馈
评分
Productivity
Server
Ai Llm
Budget
Efficiency
Gaming
规格
| Intel Core i3 10320 | HP Xeon 6526Y | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Core i3 | Xeon Gold |
| Model | 10320 | 6526Y |
| Codename | Comet Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | 14★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 4 | 16★ |
| Threads | 8 | 32★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 1 | 32★ |
| L3 Cache | 8 | 37★ |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR4 | DDR5★ |
| Max Speed | ||
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | ||
| ECC | — | ✓★ |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1200 | LGA 4677 |
| PCIe | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 80★ |
| TDP | 65★ | 195 |
| Unlocked | — | ✗ |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | No |
优缺点
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200
- Strong single thread (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Strong efficiency (70th percentile)
- Strong platform (69th percentile)
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 4677
- Strong ai (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong platform (91st percentile)91st %ile
- Strong multi thread (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong single thread (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
价格
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 12000.243每美元得分
vs
HP Xeon 6526Y 16-core LGA 46770.036每美元得分
Intel Core i3 10320 4-core LGA 1200 性价比高 6.8 倍
结论
胜出: HP Xeon 6526Y
Scores 75 overall, wins 3 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 25 specs.
