Intel Core i5 13400 10-core LGA1700
Intel
79 综合评分
vs
Intel 5120
Intel
50 综合评分
买家怎么说
Intel Core i5 13400 10-core LGA1700
72 满分 100 置信度低 7 条评价
Intel i5-13400 因其性能和性价比而备受赞誉，尤其是在 NAS 和办公构建中。用户强调其速度快、安装简便以及促销时的实惠价格。然而，一位买家收到了有缺陷的产品，并在退货期方面遇到问题，但他指出这是罕见情况。较旧的主板可能需要更新 BIOS。
优点
- 性能快速
- 安装简便
- 性价比高
- 适合 NAS 构建
- 多任务流畅
缺点
- 有缺陷产品风险
- 可能需要更新 BIOS
- 退货期问题
Performance 4
Value for money 3
Ease of installation 3
Reliability 1
Compatibility 1
Intel 5120
暂无用户反馈
评分
Efficiency
Budget
Productivity
Gaming
Ai Llm
Server
规格
| Intel Core i5 13400 | Intel 5120 | |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | ||
| Brand | Intel | Intel |
| Series | Core i5 | Xeon Gold |
| Model | 13400 | 5120 |
| Codename | Raptor Lake | — |
| Class | desktop | server |
| Process | 10★ | — |
| Cores & Clocks | ||
| Cores | 10 | 14★ |
| P-cores | 6★ | — |
| E-cores | 4★ | — |
| Threads | 16 | 28★ |
| Base Clock | ||
| Boost Clock | ||
| Cache | ||
| L2 Cache | 9.5 | 14★ |
| L3 Cache | 20★ | 19.25 |
| Performance | ||
| PassMark Multi | ||
| PassMark Single | ||
| Memory | ||
| Memory Type | DDR5★ | — |
| Max Speed | 无数据 | |
| Channels | 2★ | — |
| Max Memory | 无数据 | |
| ECC | ✗ | — |
| Platform & Power | ||
| Socket | LGA 1700 | LGA 3647 |
| PCIe | 5.0 | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20★ | — |
| TDP | 65★ | 105 |
| Max Turbo Power | 154★ | — |
| Unlocked | ✗ | — |
| Graphics & AI | ||
| Integrated Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | — |
优缺点
Intel Core i5 13400 10-core LGA1700
- Strong efficiency (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong platform (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Strong single thread (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong social proof (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Below average user sentiment (22nd percentile)
Intel 5120
- Strong multi thread (74th percentile)
- Strong ai (74th percentile)
- Strong efficiency (73rd percentile)
- Below average platform (18th percentile)18th %ile
- Below average feature (20th percentile)20th %ile
价格
Intel Core i5 13400 10-core LGA17000.274每美元得分
vs
Intel 51200.157每美元得分
Intel Core i5 13400 10-core LGA1700 性价比高 1.7 倍
结论
胜出: Intel Core i5 13400
Scores 79 overall, wins 6 of 6 usage categories and 15 of 28 specs.
